Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

VeyraX vs PetKit

VeyraX is an MCP server published by VeyraX. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). PetKit is an MCP server published by dirkjanfaber. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-19. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceVeyraXPetKit
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:257d91533072
Forks (GitHub): 19
Pulls (Docker Hub): 18 470
Stars (Docker Hub): 4
Stars (GitHub): 48
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.3.1
Downloads/month (npm): 779
Downloads/week (npm): 43
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

VeyraX vs PetKit
FactVeyraXPetKit
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)48 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)18 470No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)19 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/veyrax)On your machine (mcp-server-petkit)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)3Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 14, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/veyrax/veyrax-mcpgithub.com/dirkjanfaber/mcp-server-petkit
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

VeyraX

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

VeyraX MCP is the only connection you need to access all your tools in any MCP-compatible environment.

PetKit

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Unofficial MCP server for PetKit smart feeders: status, feeding history and schedule control.

How to run each

VeyraX As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "VEYRAX_API_KEY=<YOUR_VEYRAX_API_KEY>" --transport stdio veyrax -- docker run -i --rm -e VEYRAX_API_KEY mcp/veyrax

Requires: VEYRAX_API_KEY (secret)

PetKit As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "PETKIT_EMAIL=<YOUR_PETKIT_EMAIL>" --env "PETKIT_PASSWORD=<YOUR_PETKIT_PASSWORD>" --env "PETKIT_REGION=<YOUR_PETKIT_REGION>" --transport stdio mcp-server-petkit -- npx -y mcp-server-petkit

Requires: PETKIT_EMAIL, PETKIT_PASSWORD (secret), PETKIT_REGION

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of PetKit publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only VeyraX asks for

  • VEYRAX_API_KEY (secret)

Only PetKit asks for

  • PETKIT_EMAIL
  • PETKIT_PASSWORD (secret)
  • PETKIT_REGION
  • PETKIT_TIMEZONE

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: VeyraX · What it can do: PetKit · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built