Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Webflow vs iReceipt.pro

Webflow is an MCP server published by webflow. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). iReceipt.pro is an MCP server published by ireceipt.pro. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceWebflowiReceipt.pro
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:20e73bbc57ed
Forks (GitHub): 36
Pulls (Docker Hub): 17 488
Stars (Docker Hub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 141
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Webflow vs iReceipt.pro
FactWebflowiReceipt.pro
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)141 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)17 488No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)36 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/webflow)Remote server (mcp.ireceipt.pro/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declares (differs)21Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/webflow/mcp-servergithub.com/ireceipt-pro/mcp-setup
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)04
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checknot checked yet

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Webflow

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for the Webflow Data API.

iReceipt.pro

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Hosted MCP for iReceipt.pro: author, validate and preview HTML templates rendered to PDF and images.

How to run each

Webflow As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "WEBFLOW_TOKEN=<YOUR_WEBFLOW_TOKEN>" --transport stdio webflow -- docker run -i --rm -e WEBFLOW_TOKEN mcp/webflow

Requires: WEBFLOW_TOKEN (secret)

iReceipt.pro As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http ireceipt-pro https://mcp.ireceipt.pro/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of iReceipt.pro publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of iReceipt.pro publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Webflow · What it can do: iReceipt.pro · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built