Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Zen vs LLM Eval Harness

Zen is an MCP server published by BeehiveInnovations. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Docker MCP Catalog). LLM Eval Harness is an MCP server published by razilzul. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-22. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceZenLLM Eval Harness
Docker MCP Catalog Listed
Version: sha256:02cbe1d325db
Forks (GitHub): 1 036
Pulls (Docker Hub): 34 970
Stars (Docker Hub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 11 799
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Zen vs LLM Eval Harness
FactZenLLM Eval Harness
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)11 799 (better)0 (worse)
Pulls (Docker Hub) (differs)34 970No figure on Docker Hub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 036 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp/zen)On your machine (ghcr.io/razilzul/llm-eval-harness:1.0.0)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declares (differs)18Not published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)4, secrets among them: 42, secrets among them: 2
Licence (differs)NOASSERTIONNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/beehiveinnovations/zen-mcp-servergithub.com/razilzul/llm-eval-harness
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-18

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Zen

In its own words, on Docker MCP Catalog:

Bridges multiple AI models and CLIs, enabling orchestrated workflows across Claude Code, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI, and other AI development tools.

LLM Eval Harness

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Run a golden set and gate LLM model swaps on accuracy, with latency and cost per request.

How to run each

Zen As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "GEMINI_API_KEY=<YOUR_GEMINI_API_KEY>" --env "OPENAI_API_KEY=<YOUR_OPENAI_API_KEY>" --env "OPENROUTER_API_KEY=<YOUR_OPENROUTER_API_KEY>" --env "XAI_API_KEY=<YOUR_XAI_API_KEY>" --transport stdio zen -- docker run -i --rm -e GEMINI_API_KEY -e OPENAI_API_KEY -e OPENROUTER_API_KEY -e XAI_API_KEY mcp/zen

Requires: GEMINI_API_KEY (secret), OPENAI_API_KEY (secret), OPENROUTER_API_KEY (secret), XAI_API_KEY (secret)

LLM Eval Harness As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=<YOUR_ANTHROPIC_API_KEY>" --env "GEMINI_API_KEY=<YOUR_GEMINI_API_KEY>" --transport stdio llm-eval-harness -- docker run -i --rm -e ANTHROPIC_API_KEY -e GEMINI_API_KEY ghcr.io/razilzul/llm-eval-harness:1.0.0

Requires: ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (secret), GEMINI_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

The marketplaces of LLM Eval Harness publish no list of tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Only Zen asks for

  • OPENAI_API_KEY (secret)
  • OPENROUTER_API_KEY (secret)
  • XAI_API_KEY (secret)

Only LLM Eval Harness asks for

  • ANTHROPIC_API_KEY (secret)

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Zen · What it can do: LLM Eval Harness · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Docker MCP Catalog (desktop.docker.com/mcp/catalog) and Docker Hub. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built