Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

magents vs Echo Memory

magents is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by abnegate. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). Echo Memory is an MCP server published by ayushcodes10. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacemagentsEcho Memory
Community marketplace abnegate/magents Listed
Version: 0.13.2
Forks (GitHub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 15
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.5.3
Downloads/month (PyPI): 1 312
Downloads/week (PyPI): 212
Forks (GitHub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

magents vs Echo Memory
FactmagentsEcho Memory
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)15 (better)2 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)22
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server (api.echo-mem.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published3, secrets among them: 1
Parts of the bundle (differs)2Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/abnegate/magentsgithub.com/echo-mem/echo-mem
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)20
First seen (differs)2026-10-122026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 33 h ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

magents

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Shared session bus so Cursor can hand off with Claude, Codex, Grok, and friends.

Echo Memory

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Shared memory for AI agents, as a graph in your own Postgres. Writes never call an LLM.

How to run each

magents

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Echo Memory As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http echo-mem https://api.echo-mem.com/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: ECHO_MEMORY_AGENT_ID, ECHO_MEMORY_DATABASE_URL (secret), ECHO_MEMORY_USER_ID, Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Echo Memory has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of magents publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: magents · What it can do: Echo Memory · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built