Guided Review vs cubic
Guided Review is no longer listed on any marketplace we read: these are its last known data, as of 2026‑10‑18.
Guided Review is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by AkaraChen. No marketplace we read lists it any more. cubic is an MCP server published by cubic.dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-18. A plugin in this pair is no longer listed on any marketplace we read, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace | ||
|---|---|---|
| Community marketplace akarachen/guided-review | Removed on 2026-10-18 Version: 0.1.0 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 3 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Official MCP Registry | Not listed | Listed Version: 1.0.1 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 0 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Guided Reviewno longer listed · | cubic |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it (differs) | 0 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 3 | 0 |
| Forks (GitHub) | 0 | 0 |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | Installs as a plugin bundle | Remote server (www.cubic.dev/api/mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | Not stated | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for | Not published | Not published |
| Parts of the bundle (differs) | 1 | Not a bundle |
| Licence (differs) | MIT | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/akarachen/guided-review | github.com/mrge-io/cubic-mcp |
| Changes in the last 7 days (differs) | 4 | 0 |
| First seen (differs) | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | no remote endpoint we check | Responded 4 days ago |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. No value is marked better or worse: a plugin no marketplace lists any more is shown with its last known data, which we do not rank against current figures.
What to use instead of Guided Review
Plugins still listed whose own names, descriptions, tools and skills are closest in meaning to it. Comparable, not endorsed.
-
Review GitHub pull requests in a read-only canvas with AI-grouped changes, expandable diffs, and questions scoped to groups, files, or hunks.
-
Git diff and markdown review with a web UI plus MCP stdio for AI agents.
-
Multi-agent iterative code review until zero issues remain. Spawns up to 10 specialist reviewers (code quality, security, performance, test coverage, architecture, database, API…
-
Multi-agent code review with 8 hook-enforced roles. Each role targets a different failure surface — the skeptic reviews blind without the implementer's narrative, the security…
-
Code review with any AI model via OpenRouter. Run standard and adversarial reviews against your working tree or branch using Claude, GPT, Gemini, Llama, or any other model…
-
Comprehensive PR review agents specializing in comments, tests, error handling, type design, code quality, and code simplification
What each says it does
Guided Review
Review pull requests and produce evidence-backed Guided Review artifacts.
cubic
Triage cubic AI code review findings, start PR reviews, and read wikis, scans, and team learnings.
How to run each
Guided Review
No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.
cubic As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http cubic https://www.cubic.dev/api/mcp
Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only cubic has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.
What it can do: Guided Review · What it can do: cubic · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.