Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Bio Research vs paper-preflight

Bio Research is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Anthropic. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude: knowledge-work-plugins). paper-preflight is an MCP server published by amos689. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceBio Researchpaper-preflight
Claude: knowledge-work-plugins Listed
Version: 1.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 3 378
Stars (GitHub): 29 875
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 787
Downloads/week (PyPI): 958
Forks (GitHub): 9
Stars (GitHub): 70
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Bio Research vs paper-preflight
FactBio Researchpaper-preflight
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)29 875 (better)70 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)3 378 (better)9 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-15
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleOn your machine (paper-preflight)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)172
Licence (differs)Not statedMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsgithub.com/amos689/paper-preflight
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)04
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Bio Research

In its own words, on Claude: knowledge-work-plugins:

Connect to preclinical research tools and databases (literature search, genomics analysis, target prioritization) to accelerate early-stage life sciences R&D

paper-preflight

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Checks every LaTeX reference against Crossref, dblp, arXiv, DataCite, PubMed and OpenAlex. No LLM.

How to run each

Bio Research As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
/plugin install bio-research@knowledge-work-plugins

paper-preflight As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio paper-preflight -- uvx --with "paper-preflight[mcp]==1.0.0" paper-preflight mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Bio Research · What it can do: paper-preflight · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built