Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

PDF Viewer vs docx4j Word documents

PDF Viewer is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Anthropic. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude: knowledge-work-plugins). docx4j Word documents is an MCP server published by plutext. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacePDF Viewerdocx4j Word documents
Claude: knowledge-work-plugins Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 3 378
Stars (GitHub): 29 875
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

PDF Viewer vs docx4j Word documents
FactPDF Viewerdocx4j Word documents
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)29 875 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)3 378 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (@modelcontextprotocol/server-pdf)On your machine (https://github.com/plutext/docx4j-mcp/releases/download/v0.2.0/docx4j-mcp.mcpb)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)6Not a bundle
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsgithub.com/plutext/docx4j-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

PDF Viewer

In its own words, on Claude: knowledge-work-plugins:

View, annotate, and sign PDFs in a live interactive viewer. Mark up contracts, fill forms with visual feedback, stamp approvals, and place signatures — then download the annotated copy.

docx4j Word documents

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read, convert and fill Word (.docx) documents: templates, Markdown/HTML in and out, PDF with math.

How to run each

PDF Viewer As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
/plugin install pdf-viewer@knowledge-work-plugins

docx4j Word documents

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: PDF Viewer · What it can do: docx4j Word documents · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built