Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

run-paperclip vs Gong

run-paperclip is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Aron Prins. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). Gong is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Cursor. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Cursor: cursor/plugins). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacerun-paperclipGong
Community marketplace aronprins/run-paperclip Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 6
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Cursor: cursor/plugins Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 1 133
Stars (GitHub): 11 569
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

run-paperclip vs Gong
Factrun-paperclipGong
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)6 (worse)11 569 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)1 133 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server (mcp.gong.io/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Hooks it runs (differs)2Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)141
LicenceMITMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/aronprins/run-paperclipgithub.com/cursor/plugins
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)20
First seen (differs)2026-10-152026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 3 days ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

run-paperclip

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Run your Paperclip company from Claude Code — operate the board and embody agents on your own subscription, instead of server-side claude -p.

Gong

In its own words, on Cursor: cursor/plugins:

Pull account summaries, deal insights, and call briefs.

How to run each

run-paperclip As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add aronprins/run-paperclip
/plugin install run-paperclip@run-paperclip

Gong

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Gong has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: run-paperclip · What it can do: Gong · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built