Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

upstream-backport vs Baron

upstream-backport is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by JZ Loh. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). Baron is an MCP server published by zanaat-dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-15. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceupstream-backportBaron
Community marketplace bitshelf/linux-skills Not seen in the last pass
Version: 1.0.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.45.0
Downloads/month (npm): 507
Downloads/week (npm): 507
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

upstream-backport vs Baron
Factupstream-backportBaron
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)1 (better)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-12
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (mcp.deepwiki.com/mcp)On your machine (@zanaat/baron-mcp-server)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 0
Hooks it runs (differs)1Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)811
Licence (differs)MITApache-2.0
Repository (differs)github.com/bitshelf/linux-skillsgithub.com/zanaat-dev/baron
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)23
First seen (differs)2026-10-142026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 20 h agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

upstream-backport

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

免克隆取证 + 五阶段 backport 工作流(Buildroot/Yocto/AOSP/Debian/内核)

Baron

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Let your coding agent write to your work tracker: issues, branches, PRs and CI, one contract.

How to run each

upstream-backport As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add bitshelf/linux-skills
/plugin install upstream-backport@embedded-backport-tools

Baron As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio baron -- npx -y @zanaat/baron-mcp-server

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only upstream-backport has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of upstream-backport publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: upstream-backport · What it can do: Baron · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built