Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

linearctl vs Wrike

linearctl is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Cerebral Work Institute. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). Wrike is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Cursor. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Cursor: cursor/plugins). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacelinearctlWrike
Community marketplace cerebral-work/linearctl Listed
Version: 0.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Cursor: cursor/plugins Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 1 107
Stars (GitHub): 11 352
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

linearctl vs Wrike
FactlinearctlWrike
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub11 352
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1 107
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server (mcp.wrike.com/v2)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 1Not published
Parts of the bundle11
LicenceMITMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/cerebral-work/linearctlgithub.com/cursor/plugins
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)20
First seen (differs)2026-10-142026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 45 h ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

linearctl

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Linear workflows in Claude via the linearctl MCP server (read context, file / update / close issues).

Wrike

In its own words, on Cursor: cursor/plugins:

Search projects, create tasks, and post comments.

How to run each

linearctl As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add cerebral-work/linearctl
/plugin install linearctl@cerebral-work

Wrike

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Wrike has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Wrike publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: linearctl · What it can do: Wrike · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built