academic-paper vs paper-review-system
academic-paper is no longer listed on any marketplace we read: these are its last known data, as of 2026‑10‑23.
academic-paper is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by curryfromuestc. No marketplace we read lists it any more. paper-review-system is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by lidapengpeng. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude Code: claude-plugins-community). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-25. A plugin in this pair is no longer listed on any marketplace we read, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  paper-review-system | |
|---|---|---|
| Community marketplace curryfromuestc/academic-paper | Removed on 2026-10-23 Version: 3.1.0 Forks (GitHub): 1 Stars (GitHub): 8 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Claude Code: claude-plugins-community | Not listed | Listed Version: 2.2.0 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 2 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | academic-paperno longer listed · | paper-review-system |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it (differs) | 0 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 8 | 2 |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 1 | 0 |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs | Installs as a plugin bundle | Installs as a plugin bundle |
| Transport | Not stated | Not stated |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | Not published | 2, secrets among them: 1 |
| Hooks it runs (differs) | Not published | 1 |
| Parts of the bundle (differs) | 20 | 11 |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/curryfromuestc/academic-paper | github.com/lidapengpeng/paper-review-system |
| Changes in the last 7 days (differs) | 2 | 0 |
| First seen (differs) | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-11 |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. No value is marked better or worse: a plugin no marketplace lists any more is shown with its last known data, which we do not rank against current figures.
What to use instead of academic-paper
Plugins still listed whose own names, descriptions, tools and skills are closest in meaning to it. Comparable, not endorsed.
-
Agentic LLM tool for pre-submission self-review of formal proof-based papers.
-
Modular 8-stage paper writing workflow: Planning → Literature → Writing → Citations → Figures → Review → Revision → Submission. Combines nature-skills + ARS + Omniscale best…
-
12 specialist agents and 30 writing principles for academic writing review, research, drafting, polishing, bibliography auditing, and literature surveys, coordinated by a…
-
Checks every LaTeX reference against Crossref, dblp, arXiv, DataCite, PubMed and OpenAlex. No LLM.
-
A growing collection of Claude skills for producing academic work at Nature-journal standard. Covers scientific figures, manuscript polishing, citation retrieval, data…
-
Simulated peer reviews of your own paper in a venue's form, with an inline review card in chat.
What each says it does
academic-paper
AI-assisted writing, review, and revision for empirical EECS papers (LaTeX, bibtex, NeurIPS/CVPR/IEEE). 8 active skills + 11 agents with academic-aware AI-writing pattern removal. Phase C annotator lands later.
paper-review-system
Automated academic paper review system for Claude Code. Integrates PDF parsing (marker-pdf + PyMuPDF), reference verification (CrossRef + DBLP + Semantic Scholar), SOTA comparison, and competitive paper analysis within a structured multi-phase review pipeline. Features venue-adaptive review strategies for 15+ top CS conferences (CVPR, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ECCV, ICCV, ACL, AAAI, KDD, MICCAI, etc.), powered by distilled methodologies from 10 senior conference reviewers. Includes 8-dimension scoring, statistical rigor checks, automated quick assessment, rebuttal assistance, and parallel agent-based review architecture. Components: 3 commands (/review-paper, /pre-screen, /rebuttal), 4 specialized agents, 1 skill with 5 reference files, 2 MCP servers (11 tools total), automated dependency checking, and a quick assessment script.
How to run each
academic-paper
No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.
paper-review-system As a Claude Code plugin
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-community
/plugin install paper-review-system@claude-communityCommands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of academic-paper publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: academic-paper · What it can do: paper-review-system · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-community/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.