Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Continual Learning vs Elicitly

Continual Learning is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Eric Zakariasson. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Cursor: cursor/plugins). Elicitly is an MCP server published by elicitly.ai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceContinual LearningElicitly
Cursor: cursor/plugins Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 1 086
Stars (GitHub): 11 186
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.8.4
Downloads/month (npm): 1 280
Downloads/week (npm): 880
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Continual Learning vs Elicitly
FactContinual LearningElicitly
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)11 186 (better)1 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 086 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-13
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleOn your machine (elicitly)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Hooks it runs (differs)1Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)3Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cursor/pluginsgithub.com/elicitly/elicitly
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)01
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Continual Learning

In its own words, on Cursor: cursor/plugins:

Incremental transcript-driven memory updates for AGENTS.md using high-signal bullet points only.

Elicitly

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Human-in-the-loop for AI agents over MCP elicitation: confirm/form dialogs plus a capability doctor

How to run each

Continual Learning

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Elicitly As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio elicitly -- npx -y elicitly

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Continual Learning · What it can do: Elicitly · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built