Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Clay vs cloud.fetcher/fetcher

Clay is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Cursor. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Cursor: cursor/plugins). cloud.fetcher/fetcher is an MCP server published by fetcher.cloud. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceClaycloud.fetcher/fetcher
Cursor: cursor/plugins Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 1 107
Stars (GitHub): 11 352
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.1.3
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Clay vs cloud.fetcher/fetcher
FactClaycloud.fetcher/fetcher
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)11 352 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 107 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (api.clay.com/v3/mcp)Remote server (api.fetcher.cloud/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)1Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cursor/pluginsgithub.com/fetchercloud/fetcher-cloud
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 11 h agonot checked yet

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Clay

In its own words, on Cursor: cursor/plugins:

Enrich people and companies, run AI research agents.

cloud.fetcher/fetcher

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

The web capability layer for AI agents: render, extract, DNS, SSL, WHOIS & more via x402.

How to run each

Clay

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

cloud.fetcher/fetcher As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http fetcher https://api.fetcher.cloud/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Clay has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Clay · What it can do: cloud.fetcher/fetcher · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built