Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Interactive Brokers vs com.airblockfz/fx-signal

Interactive Brokers is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Cursor. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Cursor: cursor/plugins). com.airblockfz/fx-signal is an MCP server published by airblockfz.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-24. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceInteractive Brokerscom.airblockfz/fx-signal
Cursor: cursor/plugins Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 1 367
Stars (GitHub): 13 830
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Interactive Brokers vs com.airblockfz/fx-signal
FactInteractive Brokerscom.airblockfz/fx-signal
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)13 830No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 367No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (api.ibkr.com/v1/api/mcp-public)Remote server (fx-signal.airblock2026.workers.dev/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)1Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cursor/pluginsNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 3 days ago, requires a keyResponded 3 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Interactive Brokers

In its own words, on Cursor: cursor/plugins:

Review positions, balances, P&L, and draft trade instructions.

com.airblockfz/fx-signal

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

FX bottom/top signals: 48 pairs (USD/KRW base), verdict + score, scans. Pay-per-call x402.

How to run each

Interactive Brokers

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

com.airblockfz/fx-signal As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http fx-signal https://fx-signal.airblock2026.workers.dev/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Both endpoints responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Interactive Brokers · What it can do: com.airblockfz/fx-signal · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built