Interactive Brokers vs three.ws Vanity
Interactive Brokers is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Cursor. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Cursor: cursor/plugins). three.ws Vanity is an MCP server published by nirholas. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  three.ws Vanity | |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor: cursor/plugins | Listed Version: 1.0.0 Forks (GitHub): 1 086 Stars (GitHub): 11 186 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Official MCP Registry | Not listed | Listed Version: 0.1.3 Downloads/month (npm): 314 Downloads/week (npm): 84 Forks (GitHub): 64 Stars (GitHub): 235 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Interactive Brokers | three.ws Vanity |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it | 1 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 11 186 (better) | 235 (worse) |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 1 086 (better) | 64 (worse) |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | Remote server (api.ibkr.com/v1/api/mcp-public) | On your machine (@three-ws/vanity-mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | Not published | 2, secrets among them: 0 |
| Parts of the bundle (differs) | 1 | Not a bundle |
| Licence (differs) | MIT | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/cursor/plugins | github.com/nirholas/three.ws |
| Changes in the last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | not checked yet | no remote endpoint we check |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
Interactive Brokers
Review positions, balances, P&L, and draft trade instructions.
three.ws Vanity
Read the three.ws vanity-address market: quote difficulty + USDC price, browse the board.
How to run each
Interactive Brokers
No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.
three.ws Vanity As a local MCP server: npm package
claude mcp add --transport stdio vanity-mcp -- npx -y @three-ws/vanity-mcpCommands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of Interactive Brokers publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: Interactive Brokers · What it can do: three.ws Vanity · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.