Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

S&P Global vs Fundamentals MCP

S&P Global is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by Cursor. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Cursor: cursor/plugins). Fundamentals MCP is an MCP server published by SimonTarara62. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-19. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceS&P GlobalFundamentals MCP
Cursor: cursor/plugins Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 1 197
Stars (GitHub): 12 306
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.1
Downloads/month (PyPI): 83
Downloads/week (PyPI): 31
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

S&P Global vs Fundamentals MCP
FactS&P GlobalFundamentals MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)12 306No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 197No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (kfinance.kensho.com/integrations/mcp)On your machine (fundamentals-mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published7, secrets among them: 2
Parts of the bundle (differs)1Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cursor/pluginsgithub.com/simontarara62/fundamentals-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 4 h agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

S&P Global

In its own words, on Cursor: cursor/plugins:

Query S&P Capital IQ financials, prices, and transcripts.

Fundamentals MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Unofficial read-only MCP for fundamentals, macro & news (EDGAR + FRED + Tavily, BYO-key).

How to run each

S&P Global

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Fundamentals MCP As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "FUND_FRED_API_KEY=<YOUR_FUND_FRED_API_KEY>" --env "FUND_TAVILY_API_KEY=<YOUR_FUND_TAVILY_API_KEY>" --transport stdio fundamentals-mcp -- uvx fundamentals-mcp

Requires: FUND_FRED_API_KEY (secret), FUND_TAVILY_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only S&P Global has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of S&P Global publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: S&P Global · What it can do: Fundamentals MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/cursor/plugins/blob/HEAD/.cursor-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built