Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

cyclebottom-risk vs Nota

cyclebottom-risk is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by cyclebottom. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude Code: claude-plugins-community). Nota is an MCP server published by PugarHuda. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-13. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacecyclebottom-riskNota
Claude Code: claude-plugins-community Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

cyclebottom-risk vs Nota
Factcyclebottom-riskNota
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server (nota-ryo.vercel.app/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)1Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cyclebottom/risk-skillgithub.com/pugarhuda/nota
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 31 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

cyclebottom-risk

In its own words, on Claude Code: claude-plugins-community:

Real-time risk levels for crypto and stock indices from CycleBottom. Returns a normalized 0-1 risk score based on logarithmic deviation from the 365-day moving average for BTC, ETH, ADA, SOL, BNB, LINK, Dow Jones, S&P 500, and NASDAQ. Low risk means historically cheap (accumulation zone), high risk means historically overvalued (distribution zone). Just ask "What's the BTC risk?" or "Is the S&P 500 overvalued?" and get instant data.

Nota

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read-only crypto research skills that check a price, RSI and ATR against independent sources.

How to run each

cyclebottom-risk As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-community
/plugin install cyclebottom-risk@claude-community

Nota As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http nota https://nota-ryo.vercel.app/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Nota has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: cyclebottom-risk · What it can do: Nota · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-community/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built