Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

web-access vs Unrendered: AI Crawler Checker

web-access is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by 一泽 Eze. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). Unrendered: AI Crawler Checker is an MCP server published by missiongrowth. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-28. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceweb-accessUnrendered: AI Crawler Checker
Community marketplace eze-is/web-access Listed
Version: 2.6.0
Forks (GitHub): 659
Stars (GitHub): 9 292
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.4
Downloads/month (npm): 776
Downloads/week (npm): 40
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

web-access vs Unrendered: AI Crawler Checker
Factweb-accessUnrendered: AI Crawler Checker
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)9 292 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)659 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleOn your machine (unrendered-mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/eze-is/web-accessgithub.com/missiongrowth/unrendered-ai-crawler-checker-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-182026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

web-access

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

All web operations: search, fetch, CDP browser automation, site experience accumulation

Unrendered: AI Crawler Checker

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

AI crawler checker: shows which page content GPTBot and ClaudeBot can't read without JavaScript.

How to run each

web-access As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add eze-is/web-access
/plugin install web-access@web-access

Unrendered: AI Crawler Checker As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio unrendered-ai-crawler-checker -- npx -y unrendered-mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: web-access · What it can do: Unrendered: AI Crawler Checker · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built