Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

rustunnel vs Browserbase

rustunnel is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by joaoh82. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude Code: claude-plugins-community). Browserbase is an MCP server published by mindstone. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacerustunnelBrowserbase
Claude Code: claude-plugins-community Listed
Version: 1.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 49
Stars (GitHub): 660
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.1
Downloads/month (npm): 216
Downloads/week (npm): 60
Forks (GitHub): 4
Stars (GitHub): 12
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

rustunnel vs Browserbase
FactrustunnelBrowserbase
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)660 (better)12 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)49 (better)4 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleOn your machine (@mindstone/mcp-server-browserbase)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 13, secrets among them: 1
Parts of the bundle (differs)2Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/joaoh82/rustunnelgithub.com/mindstone/mcp-servers
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

rustunnel

In its own words, on Claude Code: claude-plugins-community:

Expose local services via secure tunnels directly from Claude Code. Create public HTTPS and TCP URLs for webhooks, demos, database access, and AI agent workflows.

Browserbase

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Browserbase MCP server: cloud browser sessions, agents, contexts, fetch, search, functions

How to run each

rustunnel As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-community
/plugin install rustunnel@claude-community

Browserbase As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "BROWSERBASE_API_KEY=<YOUR_BROWSERBASE_API_KEY>" --transport stdio mcp-server-browserbase -- npx -y @mindstone/mcp-server-browserbase

Requires: BROWSERBASE_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only rustunnel asks for

  • RUSTUNNEL_TOKEN (secret)

Only Browserbase asks for

  • BROWSERBASE_API_KEY (secret)
  • BROWSERBASE_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_MS
  • MCP_WORKSPACE_PATH

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: rustunnel · What it can do: Browserbase · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-community/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built