Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Open Scholar Skills vs Lacuna Research MCP

Open Scholar Skills is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by ZhangYGroup (Yongjun Zhang). Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). Lacuna Research MCP is an MCP server published by tiptreesystems. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, PyPI (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-28. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceOpen Scholar SkillsLacuna Research MCP
Community marketplace joshzyj/open-scholar-skill Listed
Version: 5.22.2
Forks (GitHub): 25
Stars (GitHub): 178
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.6.7
Downloads/month (PyPI): 820
Downloads/week (PyPI): 2 766
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 8
Not marked · First seen
PyPI (MCP servers) Not listed Listed
Version: 0.6.7
Downloads/month (PyPI): 820
Downloads/week (PyPI): 2 766
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 8
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Open Scholar Skills vs Lacuna Research MCP
FactOpen Scholar SkillsLacuna Research MCP
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)178 (better)8 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)25 (better)1 (worse)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-23
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server or your machine
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)Not statedMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/joshzyj/open-scholar-skillgithub.com/tiptreesystems/lacuna-research-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)24
First seen (differs)2026-10-242026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 4 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Open Scholar Skills

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

The full social-science research pipeline as skills: idea formalization, systematic literature review, theory and hypotheses, research design with power analysis, causal identification, EDA, analysis with publication-quality tables and figures, computational social science, LLM annotation, section-by-section drafting, citation verification, journal formatting, ethics, replication packages, and simulated peer review. Ships specialized reviewer, code-review, and verification subagents, plus a PreToolUse data-safety guard.

Lacuna Research MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Search Lacuna's ML research graph for papers, directions, authors, venues, and hypotheses.

How to run each

Open Scholar Skills As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add joshzyj/open-scholar-skill
/plugin install open-scholar-skill@open-scholar

Lacuna Research MCP As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http lacuna-research-mcp https://lacuna.tiptreesystems.com/api/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Lacuna Research MCP has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither the marketplaces of Open Scholar Skills nor its endpoint list any tools, so we do not compare tools.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Open Scholar Skills · What it can do: Lacuna Research MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built