Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

paper-review-system vs Science AI Journal MCP Server

paper-review-system is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by lidapengpeng. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude Code: claude-plugins-community). Science AI Journal MCP Server is an MCP server published by SelfPy. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-26. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacepaper-review-systemScience AI Journal MCP Server
Claude Code: claude-plugins-community Listed
Version: 2.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.2
Downloads/month (npm): 177
Downloads/week (npm): 16
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

paper-review-system vs Science AI Journal MCP Server
Factpaper-review-systemScience AI Journal MCP Server
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleOn your machine (science-ai-mcp-server)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for2, secrets among them: 12, secrets among them: 1
Hooks it runs (differs)1Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)11Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/lidapengpeng/paper-review-systemNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

paper-review-system

In its own words, on Claude Code: claude-plugins-community:

Automated academic paper review system for Claude Code. Integrates PDF parsing (marker-pdf + PyMuPDF), reference verification (CrossRef + DBLP + Semantic Scholar), SOTA comparison, and competitive paper analysis within a structured multi-phase review pipeline. Features venue-adaptive review strategies for 15+ top CS conferences (CVPR, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ECCV, ICCV, ACL, AAAI, KDD, MICCAI, etc.), powered by distilled methodologies from 10 senior conference reviewers. Includes 8-dimension scoring, statistical rigor checks, automated quick assessment, rebuttal assistance, and parallel agent-based review architecture. Components: 3 commands (/review-paper, /pre-screen, /rebuttal), 4 specialized agents, 1 skill with 5 reference files, 2 MCP servers (11 tools total), automated dependency checking, and a quick assessment script.

Science AI Journal MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Academic peer-review, research-gap finding, journal recommender, and article writer tools.

How to run each

paper-review-system As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-community
/plugin install paper-review-system@claude-community

Science AI Journal MCP Server As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "SCIENCE_AI_API_KEY=<YOUR_SCIENCE_AI_API_KEY>" --transport stdio science-ai-mcp-server -- npx -y science-ai-mcp-server

Requires: SCIENCE_AI_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only paper-review-system asks for

  • CROSSREF_MAILTO
  • SEMANTIC_SCHOLAR_API_KEY (secret)

Only Science AI Journal MCP Server asks for

  • SCIENCE_AI_API_KEY (secret)
  • SCIENCE_AI_BASE_URL

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: paper-review-system · What it can do: Science AI Journal MCP Server · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-community/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built