Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

paper-review-system vs org.pubscope/pubscope

paper-review-system is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by lidapengpeng. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude Code: claude-plugins-community). org.pubscope/pubscope is an MCP server published by pubscope.org. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-21. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacepaper-review-systemorg.pubscope/pubscope
Claude Code: claude-plugins-community Listed
Version: 2.2.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

paper-review-system vs org.pubscope/pubscope
Factpaper-review-systemorg.pubscope/pubscope
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server (pubscope.org/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
Hooks it runs (differs)1Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)11Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/lidapengpeng/paper-review-systemgithub.com/nadir-ib/pubscope-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 2 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

paper-review-system

In its own words, on Claude Code: claude-plugins-community:

Automated academic paper review system for Claude Code. Integrates PDF parsing (marker-pdf + PyMuPDF), reference verification (CrossRef + DBLP + Semantic Scholar), SOTA comparison, and competitive paper analysis within a structured multi-phase review pipeline. Features venue-adaptive review strategies for 15+ top CS conferences (CVPR, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ECCV, ICCV, ACL, AAAI, KDD, MICCAI, etc.), powered by distilled methodologies from 10 senior conference reviewers. Includes 8-dimension scoring, statistical rigor checks, automated quick assessment, rebuttal assistance, and parallel agent-based review architecture. Components: 3 commands (/review-paper, /pre-screen, /rebuttal), 4 specialized agents, 1 skill with 5 reference files, 2 MCP servers (11 tools total), automated dependency checking, and a quick assessment script.

org.pubscope/pubscope

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Journal intelligence: indexing, quartile, APC, trust score, measured publication times

How to run each

paper-review-system As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-community
/plugin install paper-review-system@claude-community

org.pubscope/pubscope As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http pubscope https://pubscope.org/api/mcp --header "X-Api-Key: <YOUR_X_API_KEY>"

Requires: X-Api-Key header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only org.pubscope/pubscope has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of org.pubscope/pubscope publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: paper-review-system · What it can do: org.pubscope/pubscope · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-community/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built