Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

microsoft-foundry vs ArcAgent MCP

microsoft-foundry is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by microsoft. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Copilot CLI: github/awesome-copilot). ArcAgent MCP is an MCP server published by araujota. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacemicrosoft-foundryArcAgent MCP
Copilot CLI: github/awesome-copilot Listed
Version: 1.0.14
Forks (GitHub): 262
Stars (GitHub): 2 055
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.13
Downloads/month (npm): 1 038
Downloads/week (npm): 53
Forks (GitHub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

microsoft-foundry vs ArcAgent MCP
Factmicrosoft-foundryArcAgent MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 055 (better)2 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)262 (better)2 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server (mcp.arcagent.dev/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/microsoft/foundry-dev-toolsgithub.com/araujota/arcagent
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checknot checked yet

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

microsoft-foundry

In its own words, on Copilot CLI: github/awesome-copilot:

Skills and interactive Copilot canvas for designing, configuring, testing and deploying agents to Microsoft Foundry.

ArcAgent MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

ArcAgent MCP server for bounty discovery, workspace execution, and verified coding submissions.

How to run each

microsoft-foundry

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

ArcAgent MCP As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http arcagent-mcp https://mcp.arcagent.dev/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: ARCAGENT_API_KEY (secret), Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of microsoft-foundry publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: microsoft-foundry · What it can do: ArcAgent MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/HEAD/.github/plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built