Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

microsoft-foundry vs MUJ428 Trust Layer — Bind Approved Intent to Verified Effect

microsoft-foundry is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by microsoft. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Copilot CLI: github/awesome-copilot). MUJ428 Trust Layer — Bind Approved Intent to Verified Effect is an MCP server published by wmujahid428-web. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-15. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacemicrosoft-foundryMUJ428 Trust Layer — Bind Approved Intent to Verified Effect
Copilot CLI: github/awesome-copilot Listed
Version: 1.0.14
Forks (GitHub): 262
Stars (GitHub): 2 056
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 1.6.4
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

microsoft-foundry vs MUJ428 Trust Layer — Bind Approved Intent to Verified Effect
Factmicrosoft-foundryMUJ428 Trust Layer — Bind Approved Intent to Verified Effect
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 056No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)262No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server (agents.muj428.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/microsoft/foundry-dev-toolsgithub.com/wmujahid428-web/muj428-a2a-revenue-engine
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checknot checked yet

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

microsoft-foundry

In its own words, on Copilot CLI: github/awesome-copilot:

Skills and interactive Copilot canvas for designing, configuring, testing and deploying agents to Microsoft Foundry.

MUJ428 Trust Layer — Bind Approved Intent to Verified Effect

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Payment-rail-independent intent-to-effect integrity for consequential agent actions.

How to run each

microsoft-foundry

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

MUJ428 Trust Layer — Bind Approved Intent to Verified Effect As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http muj428-trust-layer https://agents.muj428.com/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: microsoft-foundry · What it can do: MUJ428 Trust Layer — Bind Approved Intent to Verified Effect · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/HEAD/.github/plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built