content-analysis vs Scholar Sidekick
content-analysis is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by PeterMalmkjaer. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude Code: claude-plugins-community). Scholar Sidekick is an MCP server published by mlava. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  content-analysis |   Scholar Sidekick |
|---|---|---|
| Claude Code: claude-plugins-community | Listed Version: 1.1.0 Forks (GitHub): 2 Stars (GitHub): 1 Not marked · First seen |
Not listed |
| Official MCP Registry | Not listed | Listed Version: 0.8.13 Downloads/month (npm): 660 Downloads/week (npm): 140 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 11 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | content-analysis | Scholar Sidekick |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it (differs) | 1 (worse) | 2 (better) |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 1 (worse) | 11 (better) |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 2 (better) | 0 (worse) |
| Last release (differs) | Not published | 2026-10-16 |
| Where it runs (differs) | Installs as a plugin bundle | Remote server or your machine |
| Transport (differs) | Not stated | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for | Not published | Not published |
| Parts of the bundle | 2 | 2 |
| Licence (differs) | SEE LICENSE | MIT |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/petermalmkjaer/content-analysis-plugin | github.com/mlava/scholar-sidekick-mcp |
| Changes in the last 7 days (differs) | 0 | 5 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | no remote endpoint we check | Responded 2 days ago |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
content-analysis
Scientific content analysis for academic research. Supports the full workflow from research question to publication-ready output: codebook development, qualitative and quantitative coding, thematic analysis, and inter-coder reliability assessment. Follows established methodology from Krippendorff, Hsieh & Shannon, Mayring, and Braun & Clarke. Produces structured output files including coded data tables (.xlsx), theme summaries (.md), and reliability reports.
Scholar Sidekick
Catch AI-fabricated citations (real DOI + fake title). Retraction, open-access, 10,000+ CSL styles.
How to run each
content-analysis As a Claude Code plugin
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-community
/plugin install content-analysis@claude-communityScholar Sidekick As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http scholar-sidekick-mcp https://scholar-sidekick.com/api/mcpCommands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only Scholar Sidekick has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.
What it can do: content-analysis · What it can do: Scholar Sidekick · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-community/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.