Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

posthog-telemetry vs Scope Analytics

posthog-telemetry is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by PostHog. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). Scope Analytics is an MCP server published by wally827. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-25. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceposthog-telemetryScope Analytics
Community marketplace posthog/ai-plugin Listed
Version: 1.0.13
Forks (GitHub): 20
Stars (GitHub): 95
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.5
Downloads/month (PyPI): 338
Downloads/week (PyPI): 52
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

posthog-telemetry vs Scope Analytics
Factposthog-telemetryScope Analytics
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)95No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)20No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)2026-10-24Not published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleOn your machine (scope-analytics-mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published2, secrets among them: 1
Hooks it runs (differs)1Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)1Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/posthog/ai-pluginNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)70
First seen (differs)2026-10-142026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

posthog-telemetry

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Send Claude Code sessions to PostHog LLM analytics. Hooks only: no skills, no commands, no MCP server. Install this instead of the PostHog plugin, not alongside it.

Scope Analytics

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Install + query Scope analytics from an AI coding agent (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.).

How to run each

posthog-telemetry As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add posthog/ai-plugin
/plugin install posthog-telemetry@posthog

Scope Analytics As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "SCOPE_API_KEY=<YOUR_SCOPE_API_KEY>" --transport stdio scope-analytics-mcp -- uvx scope-analytics-mcp

Requires: SCOPE_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of posthog-telemetry publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: posthog-telemetry · What it can do: Scope Analytics · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built