Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

ape-context vs .FAF Context

ape-context is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by suuus. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Community GitHub marketplaces). .FAF Context is an MCP server published by Wolfe-Jam. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, npm registry (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-21. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceape-context.FAF Context
Community marketplace azure/git-ape Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed, marked deprecated
Version: 2.1.3
Downloads/month (npm): 1 610
Downloads/week (npm): 569
Forks (GitHub): 3
Stars (GitHub): 7
Not marked · First seen
npm registry (MCP servers) Not listed Listed
Version: 4.0.1
Downloads/month (npm): 1 610
Downloads/week (npm): 569
Forks (GitHub): 3
Stars (GitHub): 7
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

ape-context vs .FAF Context
Factape-context.FAF Context
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 (worse)7 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)3 (better)
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-16
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleOn your machine (faf-mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)6, secrets among them: 2Not published
Parts of the bundle (differs)19Not a bundle
LicenceMITMIT
Repository (differs)github.com/suuus/ape-contextgithub.com/wolfe-jam/faf-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-142026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

ape-context

In its own words, on Community GitHub marketplaces:

Extension for git-ape that provides enhanced context management, allowing platform teams to set up a baseline for Engineering context, tools use & intent

.FAF Context

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Dedicated IDE Edition. Persistent project context for Cursor, Windsurf, Cline, VS Code.

How to run each

ape-context

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

.FAF Context As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio faf-mcp -- npx -y faf-mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of .FAF Context publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: ape-context · What it can do: .FAF Context · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Package data comes from the public npm registry (registry.npmjs.org). Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built