Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

ru-text vs DraftCheck AI-writing linter

ru-text is a plugin bundle for AI coding tools published by talkstream. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Claude Code: claude-plugins-community). DraftCheck AI-writing linter is an MCP server published by kburrus64-max. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceru-textDraftCheck AI-writing linter
Claude Code: claude-plugins-community Listed
Version: 2.0.1
Forks (GitHub): 26
Stars (GitHub): 266
Not marked · First seen
Not listed
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.1.1
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

ru-text vs DraftCheck AI-writing linter
Factru-textDraftCheck AI-writing linter
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)266 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)26 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Installs as a plugin bundleRemote server (slopscore-nine.vercel.app/mcp)
Transport (differs)Not statedStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)3Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/talkstream/ru-textgithub.com/kburrus64-max/slopscore
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 2 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

ru-text

In its own words, on Claude Code: claude-plugins-community:

Russian text quality plugin. Auto-activates on Russian text output and applies ~1,040 rules across typography, information style, editorial standards, UX writing, and business correspondence. Eight reference files load on demand. No network calls, no telemetry.

DraftCheck AI-writing linter

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

DraftCheck: flags AI-writing patterns in prose with fix hints. Deterministic linter, not a detector.

How to run each

ru-text As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/claude-plugins-community
/plugin install ru-text@claude-community

DraftCheck AI-writing linter As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http slopscore https://slopscore-nine.vercel.app/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only DraftCheck AI-writing linter has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: ru-text · What it can do: DraftCheck AI-writing linter · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the public marketplace file https://github.com/anthropics/claude-plugins-community/blob/HEAD/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json. Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built