Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

trw-mcp vs Orchestrator

trw-mcp is an MCP server published by wallter. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (PyPI (MCP servers)). Orchestrator is an MCP server published by crAK1644. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, PyPI (MCP servers)). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-07. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacetrw-mcpOrchestrator
PyPI (MCP servers) Listed
Version: 9.5.1
Downloads/month (PyPI): 4 740
Downloads/week (PyPI): 1 046
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.12.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 6 410
Downloads/week (PyPI): 52
Forks (GitHub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 10
Not marked · First seen
Official MCP Registry Not listed Listed
Version: 0.12.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 6 410
Downloads/week (PyPI): 52
Forks (GitHub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 10
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

trw-mcp vs Orchestrator
Facttrw-mcpOrchestrator
Marketplaces that list it (differs)1 (worse)2 (better)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)10 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)2 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (trw-mcp)On your machine (orchestrator-mcp-server)
Transport (differs)Not statedstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published2, secrets among them: 0
Licence (differs)BUSL-1.1MIT
Repository (differs)github.com/wallter/trw-mcpgithub.com/crak1644/orchestrator-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen (differs)2026-10-132026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

trw-mcp

In its own words, on PyPI (MCP servers):

Engineering memory MCP server for Claude Code — patterns, gotchas, and project knowledge that persist across sessions

Orchestrator

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Let one coding-agent CLI consult another: Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, Copilot or Antigravity.

How to run each

trw-mcp

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Orchestrator As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "ORCHESTRATOR_CONFIG=<YOUR_ORCHESTRATOR_CONFIG>" --env "ORCHESTRATOR_HOST_RUNTIME=<YOUR_ORCHESTRATOR_HOST_RUNTIME>" --transport stdio orchestrator-mcp -- uvx orchestrator-mcp-server

Requires: ORCHESTRATOR_CONFIG, ORCHESTRATOR_HOST_RUNTIME

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of trw-mcp publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: trw-mcp · What it can do: Orchestrator · Compare two other plugins

Package data comes from the Python Package Index (pypi.org). Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built