Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

ai.sovantica/engrava vs Memory Engine MCP

ai.sovantica/engrava is an MCP server published by sovantica.ai. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Memory Engine MCP is an MCP server published by SimoneB79. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-25. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceai.sovantica/engravaMemory Engine MCP
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.7.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 428
Downloads/week (PyPI): 54
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.5.3
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

ai.sovantica/engrava vs Memory Engine MCP
Factai.sovantica/engravaMemory Engine MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub)11
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (engrava-mcp)On your machine (ghcr.io/simoneb79/memory-engine-mcp:1.5.3)
Transport (differs)stdioSSE
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for3, secrets among them: 03, secrets among them: 0
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/sovantica/engrava-mcpgithub.com/simoneb79/memory-engine-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

ai.sovantica/engrava

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MindQL queries, hybrid search, and a thought graph - read/write memory for AI agents.

Memory Engine MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Local-first graph memory for AI assistants with SQLite, semantic search, and MCP tools.

How to run each

ai.sovantica/engrava As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "ENGRAVA_DB_PATH=<YOUR_ENGRAVA_DB_PATH>" --transport stdio engrava -- uvx engrava-mcp

Requires: ENGRAVA_DB_PATH

Memory Engine MCP

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only ai.sovantica/engrava asks for

  • ENGRAVA_DB_PATH
  • ENGRAVA_MCP_CONFIG
  • ENGRAVA_MCP_READ_ONLY

Only Memory Engine MCP asks for

  • MARKDOWN_SOURCE
  • MEMORY_DB_PATH
  • MEMORY_PORT

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: ai.sovantica/engrava · What it can do: Memory Engine MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built