Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Malinois vs CodeVulnerability

Malinois is an MCP server published by malinois.app. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). CodeVulnerability is an MCP server published by Evozim. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-19. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceMalinoisCodeVulnerability
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Malinois vs CodeVulnerability
FactMalinoisCodeVulnerability
Marketplaces that list it11
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (malinois.app/mcp)Remote server (codevulnerability-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPSSE
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
RepositoryNot statedNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 2 days agoAnswered with HTTP 402 (29 h ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Malinois

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Check a live app you own for public databases, leaked keys and exposed files.

CodeVulnerability

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

OWASP threat scanner auditing codebases for safety leaks.

How to run each

Malinois As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http scan https://malinois.app/mcp

CodeVulnerability As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport sse codevulnerability https://codevulnerability-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp --header "payment-signature: <YOUR_PAYMENT_SIGNATURE>"

Requires: payment-signature header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only the endpoint of Malinois responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Malinois · What it can do: CodeVulnerability · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built