Anythink all-in-one backend: data, auth, files, workflows, payments, APIs vs PassNinja
Anythink all-in-one backend: data, auth, files, workflows, payments, APIs is an MCP server published by anythink.cloud. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). PassNinja is an MCP server published by flomio. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-14. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  Anythink all-in-one backend: data, auth, files, workflows, payments, APIs |  PassNinja |
|---|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry | Listed Version: 0.2.37 Forks (GitHub): 3 Stars (GitHub): 6 Not marked · First seen |
Listed Version: 0.4.0 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 0 Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | Anythink all-in-one backend: data, auth, files, workflows, payments, APIs | PassNinja |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it (differs) | 2 (better) | 1 (worse) |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 6 (better) | 0 (worse) |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 3 (better) | 0 (worse) |
| Last release (differs) | 2026-10-12 | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | Remote server (mcp.anythink.cloud/mcp) | On your machine (https://github.com/flomio/passninja-cli/releases/download/v0.4.0/passninja.mcpb) |
| Transport (differs) | Streamable HTTP | stdio |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for | Not published | Not published |
| Parts of the bundle (differs) | 1 | Not a bundle |
| Licence (differs) | MIT | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/anythink-cloud/anythink-cli | github.com/flomio/passninja-cli |
| Changes in the last 7 days (differs) | 3 | 0 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | Responded 2 days ago | no remote endpoint we check |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
Anythink all-in-one backend: data, auth, files, workflows, payments, APIs
Sick of stitched-together services? Anythink is the all-in-one backend, configured with AI.
PassNinja
Issue and manage Apple Wallet & Google Wallet passes from any MCP-aware AI client.
How to run each
Anythink all-in-one backend: data, auth, files, workflows, payments, APIs As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http anythink https://mcp.anythink.cloud/mcpPassNinja
No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.
Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only Anythink all-in-one backend: data, auth, files, workflows, payments, APIs has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.
What it can do: Anythink all-in-one backend: data, auth, files, workflows, payments, APIs · What it can do: PassNinja · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.