Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

image-ocr vs Tanod Image OCR (Apify, card-paid)

image-ocr is an MCP server published by ocr.kymac.co. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Tanod Image OCR (Apify, card-paid) is an MCP server published by tanod.dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-26. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceimage-ocrTanod Image OCR (Apify, card-paid)
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.4.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

image-ocr vs Tanod Image OCR (Apify, card-paid)
Factimage-ocrTanod Image OCR (Apify, card-paid)
Marketplaces that list it11
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (ocr.kymac.co/mcp)Remote server (mcp.apify.com)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
RepositoryNot statedNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-22
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Not responding since 2026-10-15Not responding since 2026-10-24

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

image-ocr

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Image URL → plain text OCR for bots. Free try then prepaid TEST. https://ocr.kymac.co

Tanod Image OCR (Apify, card-paid)

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Image OCR via Apify. Pay by card with an Apify account, no crypto wallet.

How to run each

image-ocr As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http image-ocr https://ocr.kymac.co/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>" --header "X-API-Key: <YOUR_X_API_KEY>"

Requires: Authorization header, X-API-Key header

Tanod Image OCR (Apify, card-paid)

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Neither endpoint responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: image-ocr · What it can do: Tanod Image OCR (Apify, card-paid) · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built