Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

CorroborateMe vs Jentic Remote MCP Server

CorroborateMe is an MCP server published by cnrcode.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Jentic Remote MCP Server is an MCP server published by jentic. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-26. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceCorroborateMeJentic Remote MCP Server
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.4
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

CorroborateMe vs Jentic Remote MCP Server
FactCorroborateMeJentic Remote MCP Server
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)1No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last release (differs)2026-10-22Not published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (corroborateme.com/mcp)Remote server (api.jentic.com/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cnr-consulting/corroborate-meNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)20
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 4 days ago, requires a keyResponded 6 days ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

CorroborateMe

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Prove end users to agents and apps: login-links, OIDC clients, and API keys over remote MCP

Jentic Remote MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Remote MCP for 1,500+ APIs. Vault-managed credentials; OAuth or API key. Search, load, and execute.

How to run each

CorroborateMe As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http corroborateme https://corroborateme.com/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Jentic Remote MCP Server As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http jentic-remote-mcp-server https://api.jentic.com/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Both endpoints responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: CorroborateMe · What it can do: Jentic Remote MCP Server · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built