Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

nittim vs io.github.notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer

nittim is an MCP server published by nittim.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). io.github.notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer is an MCP server published by notasandy. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-29. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacenittimio.github.notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.1.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 67
Downloads/week (PyPI): 21
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 3
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

nittim vs io.github.notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer
Factnittimio.github.notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)3 (better)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (nittim.com/api/mcp)On your machine (mcp-code-sanitizer)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/ilanwolberger/nittim-mcpgithub.com/notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 6 days agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

nittim

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Production-safety audits for AI-generated code, with a fix for every finding.

io.github.notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Strict AI code reviewer powered by Groq. Finds bugs and vulnerabilities.

How to run each

nittim As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http nittim https://nittim.com/api/mcp

io.github.notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "GROQ_API_KEY=<YOUR_GROQ_API_KEY>" --transport stdio mcp-code-sanitizer -- uvx mcp-code-sanitizer

Requires: GROQ_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only nittim has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of nittim publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: nittim · What it can do: io.github.notasandy/mcp-code-sanitizer · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built