Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

com.puter/mcp-server vs sh.objekt/mcp-upload

com.puter/mcp-server is an MCP server published by puter.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). sh.objekt/mcp-upload is an MCP server published by objekt.sh. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-26. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacecom.puter/mcp-serversh.objekt/mcp-upload
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.1
Forks (GitHub): 4 116
Stars (GitHub): 43 899
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.5
Downloads/month (npm): 94
Downloads/week (npm): 11
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

com.puter/mcp-server vs sh.objekt/mcp-upload
Factcom.puter/mcp-serversh.objekt/mcp-upload
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)43 899 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)4 116 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (mcp.puter.com)On your machine (@objekt.sh/mcp-upload)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published1, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/heyputer/putergithub.com/0xlighthouse/objekt-mcp-upload
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Not responding since 2026-10-26no remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

com.puter/mcp-server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Puter MCP enables AI tools to interact with Puter: manage files, websites, workers, and more

sh.objekt/mcp-upload

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Public file storage for AI agents. Upload files and get a permalink back.

How to run each

com.puter/mcp-server As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http com-puter-mcp-server https://mcp.puter.com/

sh.objekt/mcp-upload As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "OBJEKT_API_KEY=<YOUR_OBJEKT_API_KEY>" --transport stdio mcp-upload -- npx -y @objekt.sh/mcp-upload

Requires: OBJEKT_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only com.puter/mcp-server has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of com.puter/mcp-server publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: com.puter/mcp-server · What it can do: sh.objekt/mcp-upload · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built