Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

TextToQuant Backtesting and Quant Research vs PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP

TextToQuant Backtesting and Quant Research is an MCP server published by texttoquant.com. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP is an MCP server published by pineforge-4pass. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceTextToQuant Backtesting and Quant ResearchPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 2.6.1
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.9.40
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 7
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

TextToQuant Backtesting and Quant Research vs PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP
FactTextToQuant Backtesting and Quant ResearchPineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub7
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub1
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-12
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (www.texttoquant.com/api/mcp)On your machine (ghcr.io/pineforge-4pass/pineforge-backtest-mcp:v0.9.40)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/pineforge-4pass/pineforge-backtest-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)02
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)not checked yetno remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

TextToQuant Backtesting and Quant Research

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Backtest plain-English trading strategies on real market data: graded results, honesty flags.

PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Offline PineScript v6 → C++ backtests at deterministic TradingView parity, run locally via MCP.

How to run each

TextToQuant Backtesting and Quant Research As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http texttoquant https://www.texttoquant.com/api/mcp

PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio pineforge-backtest-mcp -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/pineforge-4pass/pineforge-backtest-mcp:v0.9.40

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: TextToQuant Backtesting and Quant Research · What it can do: PineForge — offline PineScript v6 backtest MCP · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built