Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

emisar vs Linux MCP daemon (mcpd)

emisar is an MCP server published by emisar.dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Linux MCP daemon (mcpd) is an MCP server published by nucleusv. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceemisarLinux MCP daemon (mcpd)
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.53.0
Forks (GitHub): 33
Stars (GitHub): 337
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.5.1
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 6
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

emisar vs Linux MCP daemon (mcpd)
FactemisarLinux MCP daemon (mcpd)
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)337 (better)6 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)33 (better)1 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (emisar.dev/api/mcp/rpc)Not stated
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPSSE
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/andrewdryga/emisargithub.com/nucleusv/linux-mcp-daemon
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 2 days agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

emisar

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Let AI operate servers without SSH. Choose actions, approve risky changes, and audit every step.

Linux MCP daemon (mcpd)

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

AI agent access to Linux servers without SSH: scoped tools, per-call isolation, root only if granted

How to run each

emisar As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http emisar https://emisar.dev/api/mcp/rpc

Linux MCP daemon (mcpd)

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only emisar has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: emisar · What it can do: Linux MCP daemon (mcpd) · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built