Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Exit1 Uptime Monitoring vs SolidPing

Exit1 Uptime Monitoring is an MCP server published by exit1.dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). SolidPing is an MCP server published by fclairamb. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-15. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceExit1 Uptime MonitoringSolidPing
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.4.0
Downloads/month (npm): 281
Downloads/week (npm): 175
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.38.5
Forks (GitHub): 2
Stars (GitHub): 19
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Exit1 Uptime Monitoring vs SolidPing
FactExit1 Uptime MonitoringSolidPing
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)19 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)2 (better)
Last release (differs)2026-10-12 (worse)2026-10-14 (better)
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (app.exit1.dev/mcp/v1)Remote server (solidping.io/api/v1/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 1Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/mopra/exit1.dev.mcpgithub.com/fclairamb/solidping
Changes in the last 7 days33
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)not checked yetAnswered with HTTP 302 (36 h ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Exit1 Uptime Monitoring

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Set up uptime monitoring from your editor: create checks, alerts, and query uptime. Can sign you up.

SolidPing

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Self-hostable uptime monitoring: create checks, read incidents, manage status pages.

How to run each

Exit1 Uptime Monitoring As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http exit1-mcp https://app.exit1.dev/mcp/v1

Requires: EXIT1_API_KEY (secret)

SolidPing As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http solidping https://solidping.io/api/v1/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only SolidPing has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of SolidPing publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: Exit1 Uptime Monitoring · What it can do: SolidPing · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built