Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

TeleQuick Platform vs Apiosk Connect

TeleQuick Platform is an MCP server published by telequick.dev. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Apiosk Connect is an MCP server published by obcraft. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-26. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceTeleQuick PlatformApiosk Connect
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.7.0
Downloads/month (npm): 314
Downloads/week (npm): 18
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

TeleQuick Platform vs Apiosk Connect
FactTeleQuick PlatformApiosk Connect
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Forks (GitHub) (differs)No figure on GitHub0
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (portal.telequick.dev/mcp)Remote server (mcp.apiosk.com/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)Not published2, secrets among them: 2
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)Not statedgithub.com/obcraft/apiosk-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 4 days agoResponded 3 days ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

TeleQuick Platform

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Tenant-scoped control plane over the TeleQuick platform's full API surface

Apiosk Connect

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Discover, pay for, execute, and publish APIs through Apiosk.

How to run each

TeleQuick Platform As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http portal https://portal.telequick.dev/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Apiosk Connect As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http apiosk-mcp https://mcp.apiosk.com/mcp

Requires: APIOSK_CONNECT_TOKEN (secret), APIOSK_PRIVATE_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Both endpoints responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of TeleQuick Platform publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: TeleQuick Platform · What it can do: Apiosk Connect · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built