Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Dockhold vs Artifacts

Dockhold is an MCP server published by dockhold.eu. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Artifacts is an MCP server published by kuyazee. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-25. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceDockholdArtifacts
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.2.0
Downloads/month (npm): 1 065
Downloads/week (npm): 33
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 5
Stars (GitHub): 6
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Dockhold vs Artifacts
FactDockholdArtifacts
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)6 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0 (worse)5 (better)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (api.dockhold.eu/mcp)On your machine (ghcr.io/kuyazee/artifacts:latest)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 02, secrets among them: 1
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/dockhold/mcpgithub.com/kuyazee/artifacts
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Responded 2 days agono remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Dockhold

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Deploy your project to a live HTTPS URL from your AI tool; read logs, set variables, resize apps.

Artifacts

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Self-hosted artifact publishing: POST HTML/JSX/Markdown/zip, get an unguessable URL on your domain

How to run each

Dockhold As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http dockhold https://api.dockhold.eu/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Artifacts

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Requires: ARTIFACTS_API_KEY (secret)

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Dockhold has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only Dockhold asks for

  • DOCKHOLD_REF

Only Artifacts asks for

  • ARTIFACTS_API_KEY (secret)
  • BASE_URL

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Dockhold · What it can do: Artifacts · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built