Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

io.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkit vs io.github.jnMetaCode/shellward

io.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkit is an MCP server published by 26zl. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). io.github.jnMetaCode/shellward is an MCP server published by jnMetaCode. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceio.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkitio.github.jnMetaCode/shellward
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.4.0
Forks (GitHub): 12
Stars (GitHub): 75
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.5.11
Downloads/month (npm): 1 533
Downloads/week (npm): 279
Forks (GitHub): 24
Stars (GitHub): 140
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

io.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkit vs io.github.jnMetaCode/shellward
Factio.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkitio.github.jnMetaCode/shellward
Marketplaces that list it (differs)2 (better)1 (worse)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)75 (worse)140 (better)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)12 (worse)24 (better)
Last release (differs)2026-10-16Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (ghcr.io/26zl/cybersec-toolkit:1.4.0)On your machine (shellward)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)2, secrets among them: 03, secrets among them: 0
Parts of the bundle (differs)873Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MIT AND Apache-2.0 AND CC-BY-SA-4.0Not stated
Repository (differs)github.com/26zl/cybersec-toolkitgithub.com/jnmetacode/shellward
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)60
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

io.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkit

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Authorization-gated MCP server to discover and run 670+ security tools for CTF, pentest, and DFIR.

io.github.jnMetaCode/shellward

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

AI agent security: 7 MCP tools for injection detection, PII scanning, command safety, DLP.

How to run each

io.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkit As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio cybersec-toolkit -- docker run -i --rm --entrypoint uv --security-opt no-new-privileges ghcr.io/26zl/cybersec-toolkit:1.4.0 run --directory mcp_server fastmcp run server.py --transport stdio --no-banner

io.github.jnMetaCode/shellward As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio shellward -- npx -y shellward

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only io.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkit asks for

  • CYBERSEC_MCP_ALLOW_EXTERNAL
  • CYBERSEC_MCP_ALLOW_SCRIPTS

Only io.github.jnMetaCode/shellward asks for

  • SHELLWARD_LOCALE
  • SHELLWARD_MODE
  • SHELLWARD_THRESHOLD

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: io.github.26zl/cybersec-toolkit · What it can do: io.github.jnMetaCode/shellward · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built