Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

CoS Codex Bridge vs Coador

CoS Codex Bridge is an MCP server published by AV-Labs-Co. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Coador is an MCP server published by automaticqa. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-19. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceCoS Codex BridgeCoador
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.1.4
Downloads/month (npm): 836
Downloads/week (npm): 79
Forks (GitHub): 1
Stars (GitHub): 3
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.0
Downloads/month (PyPI): 226
Downloads/week (PyPI): 14
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

CoS Codex Bridge vs Coador
FactCoS Codex BridgeCoador
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)3 (better)1 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)1 (better)0 (worse)
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (cos-codex-bridge)On your machine (coador)
Transportstdiostdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)1, secrets among them: 0Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/av-labs-co/cos-codex-bridgegithub.com/automaticqa/coador
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

CoS Codex Bridge

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Operate Codex projects and tasks from a Chief of Staff with scoped access and durable receipts.

Coador

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Evidence-backed Android repository knowledge for humans and AI agents

How to run each

CoS Codex Bridge As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "COS_BRIDGE_CONFIG=<YOUR_COS_BRIDGE_CONFIG>" --transport stdio cos-codex-bridge -- npx -y cos-codex-bridge mcp

Requires: COS_BRIDGE_CONFIG

Coador As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio coador -- uvx coador mcp --repo "<YOUR_REPO>"

Requires: --repo

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Coador publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: CoS Codex Bridge · What it can do: Coador · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built