HTTP vs Boundary Guard x402
HTTP is an MCP server published by Abhishekkumar2021. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Boundary Guard x402 is an MCP server published by LarryLemonBot. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-23. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.
Where each is published
| Marketplace |  HTTP | |
|---|---|---|
| Official MCP Registry | Listed Version: 0.1.0 Downloads/month (npm): 184 Downloads/week (npm): 31 Forks (GitHub): 0 Stars (GitHub): 1 Not marked · First seen |
Listed Version: 0.1.0 No figure published Not marked · First seen |
Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.
The facts side by side
| Fact | HTTP | Boundary Guard x402 |
|---|---|---|
| Marketplaces that list it | 1 | 1 |
| Stars (GitHub) (differs) | 1 | No figure on GitHub |
| Forks (GitHub) (differs) | 0 | No figure on GitHub |
| Last release | Not published | Not published |
| Where it runs (differs) | On your machine (@abhishekmcp/http) | Remote server (x402-resource-scanner.vercel.app/mcp) |
| Transport (differs) | stdio | Streamable HTTP |
| Tools it declares | Not published | Not published |
| Environment variables it asks for (differs) | 2, secrets among them: 0 | Not published |
| Licence (differs) | MIT | Not stated |
| Repository (differs) | github.com/abhishekkumar2021/mcp-suite | Not stated |
| Changes in the last 7 days | 0 | 0 |
| First seen | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-11 |
| Endpoint at the last check (differs) | no remote endpoint we check | Responded 3 days ago |
Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.
What each says it does
HTTP
HTTP/REST client with saved collections, env secrets, and SSRF-safe host allowlisting.
Boundary Guard x402
MCP tools for x402 readiness, paid-path probes, launch packs, and trust receipts.
How to run each
HTTP As a local MCP server: npm package
claude mcp add --env "HTTP_ALLOW_HOSTS=<YOUR_HTTP_ALLOW_HOSTS>" --transport stdio http -- npx -y @abhishekmcp/httpRequires: HTTP_ALLOW_HOSTS
Boundary Guard x402 As a remote MCP server
claude mcp add --transport http boundary-guard-x402 https://x402-resource-scanner.vercel.app/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"Requires: Authorization header
Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.
Only Boundary Guard x402 has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints
Tools each declares
Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.
Settings each asks for
The marketplaces of Boundary Guard x402 publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.
What it can do: HTTP · What it can do: Boundary Guard x402 · Compare two other plugins
Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.