Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Cartographer vs Orbit

Cartographer is an MCP server published by BeppeTemp. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Orbit is an MCP server published by orbit-search. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-21. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceCartographerOrbit
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 0.25.1
Forks (GitHub): 9
Stars (GitHub): 40
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 2.0.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Cartographer vs Orbit
FactCartographerOrbit
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)40 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub) (differs)9 (better)0 (worse)
Last release (differs)2026-10-20Not published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (ghcr.io/beppetemp/cartographer:v0.25.1)Remote server (api.orbitsearch.com/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/beppetemp/cartographergithub.com/orbit-search/orbit-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)40
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkResponded 17 h ago, requires a key

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Cartographer

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Governance MCP server for agent-maintained knowledge bases (OKF): git-backed writes, search, lint.

Orbit

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

The most in-depth, source-backed context about a person for deep personalization and research.

How to run each

Cartographer As a local MCP server: Docker image

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio cartographer -- docker run -i --rm ghcr.io/beppetemp/cartographer:v0.25.1

Orbit As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http orbit https://api.orbitsearch.com/mcp --header "Authorization: Bearer <YOUR_TOKEN>"

Requires: Authorization header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Orbit has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Cartographer · What it can do: Orbit · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built