Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

CAST Imaging MCP Server vs Image Puma

CAST Imaging MCP Server is an MCP server published by CAST-Extend. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Image Puma is an MCP server published by panth-net. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-16. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceCAST Imaging MCP ServerImage Puma
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 3.0.4
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 2
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
Downloads/month (npm): 142
Downloads/week (npm): 28
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

CAST Imaging MCP Server vs Image Puma
FactCAST Imaging MCP ServerImage Puma
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)2 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (docker.io/castimaging/imaging-mcp-server:3.0.4)On your machine (image-puma)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)4, secrets among them: 0Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/cast-extend/cast-imaging-mcpgithub.com/panth-net/image-puma
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

CAST Imaging MCP Server

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP server exposing CAST Imaging software architecture insights to AI agents

Image Puma

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Plan and run local batch image preparation with explicit confirmation before writing files.

How to run each

CAST Imaging MCP Server

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Requires: HOST_CONTROL_PANEL, SERVICE_HOST

Image Puma As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio image-puma -- npx -y image-puma

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Image Puma publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: CAST Imaging MCP Server · What it can do: Image Puma · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built