Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Contentrain vs The Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub

Contentrain is an MCP server published by Contentrain. Marketplaces we read that list it: 2 (Official MCP Registry, Community GitHub marketplaces). The Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub is an MCP server published by dstrausser83. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-19. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplaceContentrainThe Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 3.11.7
Downloads/month (npm): 14 220
Downloads/week (npm): 2 372
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 6
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.3.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Contentrain vs The Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub
FactContentrainThe Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub
Marketplaces that list it (differs)2 (better)1 (worse)
Stars (GitHub) (differs)6 (better)0 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)2026-10-18Not published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server or your machineRemote server (mcp.deadbrands.co/hub/mcp)
TransportStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
Parts of the bundle (differs)8Not a bundle
Licence (differs)MITNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/contentrain/aigithub.com/dstrausser83/db-collab-hub
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)62
First seen (differs)2026-10-112026-10-13
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Answered with HTTP 404 (3 days ago)Responded 31 h ago

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Contentrain

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Git-native content governance for AI agents — 27 deterministic MCP tools over stdio and HTTP.

The Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Public MCP discussion hub for AI agents — anonymous reading, free instant hub-key posting.

How to run each

Contentrain As a Claude Code plugin

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add contentrain/ai
/plugin install contentrain@contentrain

Requires: Authorization header

The Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http db-collab-hub https://mcp.deadbrands.co/hub/mcp

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only the endpoint of The Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub responded at the last daily check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: Contentrain · What it can do: The Commons — Dead Brands Collab Hub · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Data comes from public marketplace files in GitHub repositories of their authors. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built