Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

air-Q Cloud vs Data Observability

air-Q Cloud is an MCP server published by CorantGmbH. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Data Observability is an MCP server published by Evozim. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-24. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplaceair-Q CloudData Observability
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.4.6
Downloads/month (PyPI): 330
Downloads/week (PyPI): 74
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 0
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.0.0
No figure published
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

air-Q Cloud vs Data Observability
Factair-Q CloudData Observability
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Forks (GitHub) (differs)0No figure on GitHub
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (mcp-airq-cloud)Remote server (data-observability-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioSSE
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for (differs)3, secrets among them: 2Not published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/corantgmbh/mcp-airq-cloudNot stated
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)no remote endpoint we checkAnswered with HTTP 402 (5 days ago)

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

air-Q Cloud

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

MCP server for air-Q Cloud API — access air quality data from anywhere

Data Observability

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

SQL data health analyzer and pipeline observability evaluator.

How to run each

air-Q Cloud As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "AIRQ_CLOUD_API_KEY=<YOUR_AIRQ_CLOUD_API_KEY>" --env "AIRQ_CLOUD_DEVICES=<YOUR_AIRQ_CLOUD_DEVICES>" --transport stdio mcp-airq-cloud -- uvx mcp-airq-cloud

Requires: AIRQ_CLOUD_API_KEY (secret), AIRQ_CLOUD_DEVICES (secret)

Data Observability As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport sse data-observability https://data-observability-mcp.vercel.app/api/mcp --header "payment-signature: <YOUR_PAYMENT_SIGNATURE>"

Requires: payment-signature header

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only Data Observability has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

The marketplaces of Data Observability publish no settings it asks for, so we do not compare settings.

What it can do: air-Q Cloud · What it can do: Data Observability · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built