Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

Pusher Channels vs fmsg

Pusher Channels is an MCP server published by CrashBytes. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). fmsg is an MCP server published by markmnl. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-10-17. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
MarketplacePusher Channelsfmsg
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 1.0.3
Downloads/month (npm): 197
Downloads/week (npm): 33
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 3
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 1.2.0
Downloads/month (npm): 2 251
Downloads/week (npm): 1 240
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

Pusher Channels vs fmsg
FactPusher Channelsfmsg
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)3 (better)1 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last release (differs)Not published2026-10-17
Where it runs (differs)On your machine (@crashbytes/pusher-mcp-server)On your machine (@markmnl/fmsg-mcp)
Transport (differs)stdioStreamable HTTP
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks for4, secrets among them: 14, secrets among them: 1
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/crashbytes/pusher-mcp-servergithub.com/markmnl/fmsg-mcp
Changes in the last 7 days (differs)03
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

Pusher Channels

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Trigger events, query channels, and manage realtime messaging on Pusher Channels.

fmsg

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Federated messaging with your fmsg hosting provider. Connect with OAuth or an API key.

How to run each

Pusher Channels As a local MCP server: npm package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --env "PUSHER_APP_ID=<YOUR_PUSHER_APP_ID>" --env "PUSHER_CLUSTER=<YOUR_PUSHER_CLUSTER>" --env "PUSHER_KEY=<YOUR_PUSHER_KEY>" --env "PUSHER_SECRET=<YOUR_PUSHER_SECRET>" --transport stdio pusher-mcp-server -- npx -y @crashbytes/pusher-mcp-server

Requires: PUSHER_APP_ID, PUSHER_CLUSTER, PUSHER_KEY, PUSHER_SECRET (secret)

fmsg

No data for an automatic command: what its marketplaces declare does not say unambiguously how to connect it.

Requires: FMSG_API_KEY (secret), FMSG_API_URL

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Only Pusher Channels asks for

  • PUSHER_APP_ID
  • PUSHER_CLUSTER
  • PUSHER_KEY
  • PUSHER_SECRET (secret)

Only fmsg asks for

  • FMSG_API_KEY (secret)
  • FMSG_API_URL
  • FMSG_DEFAULT_DOMAIN
  • FMSG_MCP_DOWNLOAD_DIR

Settings as each marketplace publishes them. Asking for fewer is not better in itself.

What it can do: Pusher Channels · What it can do: fmsg · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built