Ext Ops Panel
Open dashboard
Comparison

hypernatt-terminal vs Hyperliquid Agent Gateway

hypernatt-terminal is an MCP server published by DIALLOUBE-RESEARCH. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). Hyperliquid Agent Gateway is an MCP server published by alekskram. Marketplaces we read that list it: 1 (Official MCP Registry). As of our marketplace pass on 2026-11-04. This pair was picked by a reader, not by our comparison rule, so search engines are asked not to index the page.

Where each is published

Where each is published
Marketplacehypernatt-terminalHyperliquid Agent Gateway
Official MCP Registry Listed
Version: 2.8.0
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 3
Not marked · First seen
Listed
Version: 0.1.3
Downloads/month (PyPI): 391
Downloads/week (PyPI): 60
Forks (GitHub): 0
Stars (GitHub): 1
Not marked · First seen

Each figure is the marketplace's own and is never added up across marketplaces. A marketplace that publishes no figure shows none: no number is not zero.

The facts side by side

hypernatt-terminal vs Hyperliquid Agent Gateway
Facthypernatt-terminalHyperliquid Agent Gateway
Marketplaces that list it11
Stars (GitHub) (differs)3 (better)1 (worse)
Forks (GitHub)00
Last releaseNot publishedNot published
Where it runs (differs)Remote server (hypernatt.com/mcp/protocol)On your machine (hyperliquid-agent-gateway)
Transport (differs)Streamable HTTPstdio
Tools it declaresNot publishedNot published
Environment variables it asks forNot publishedNot published
LicenceNot statedNot stated
Repository (differs)github.com/dialloube-research/hypernatt-terminalgithub.com/alekskram/hyperliquid-agent-gateway
Changes in the last 7 days00
First seen2026-10-112026-10-11
Endpoint at the last check (differs)Answered with HTTP 400 (4 days ago)no remote endpoint we check

Lines where the two differ have a tinted background and bold values. Where the data itself says which value is better (more marketplaces, a larger figure of the same marketplace, a fresher release, a verified mark on a marketplace that lists both), the better one is also marked green with ▲ and the worse one red with ▼. Where it runs, the transport, the tools, the settings, hooks, the bundle's parts, the licence and the week's changes are marked only as different: more or fewer is not better in itself.

What each says it does

hypernatt-terminal

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Liquidation radar, execution context and Li.Fi swaps for AI agents. 6 MCP tools; x402 payments.

Hyperliquid Agent Gateway

In its own words, on Official MCP Registry:

Read-only MCP gateway to Hyperliquid: liquidation distance, funding carry, HyperEVM flows. No keys.

How to run each

hypernatt-terminal As a remote MCP server

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http hypernatt-terminal https://hypernatt.com/mcp/protocol

Hyperliquid Agent Gateway As a local MCP server: PyPI package

Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport stdio hyperliquid-agent-gateway -- uvx hyperliquid-agent-gateway

Commands built only from what the marketplaces declare; the full set for every client is on each card.

Only hypernatt-terminal has a remote endpoint we check. How we check endpoints

Tools each declares

Neither one's marketplaces publish a list of tools, so there is nothing to compare.

Settings each asks for

Neither one's marketplaces publish the settings it asks for.

What it can do: hypernatt-terminal · What it can do: Hyperliquid Agent Gateway · Compare two other plugins

Data comes from the Official MCP Registry (registry.modelcontextprotocol.io), CC0 1.0. Figures come from our own regular passes over the marketplaces, last read on . We publish no contact details for plugin publishers.

Where the data comes from: how the catalog is built